ThunderFurries, Yay!
Posted by gingaio
| December 20, 2011 11:51PM |
| January 02, 2012 09:06AM |
Just saw the new 6" Classics at the Wal-Mart This morning. The Mum-Ra is pretty cool. The Lion-O not so much...To me he looked like a scaled down version of the 8" version with a new head. It is very possible that I am wrong about that.
Also saw the Armour of Omens and overall thought it looked pretty nifty. The vac-metalized gold chest was cool the bent in the package rubbery sword not so much...If (or should I say when) it hits clearance I'll probably grab one...
Also saw the Armour of Omens and overall thought it looked pretty nifty. The vac-metalized gold chest was cool the bent in the package rubbery sword not so much...If (or should I say when) it hits clearance I'll probably grab one...
| January 03, 2012 09:23PM |
Most of the Big Box stores near us are either: A) not carrying the Thundercats line; or B) bogged down with the first run of figures.
Regarding the last point, I finally - FINALLY - saw an 8" Lion-O in a store this past weekend. Naturally, it was totally out of place in the wrong part of the toy isles. As if it were somehow running from the dozens of Tigra figures malingering on the shelf. But today I was on the other side of the city and popped into a Big Box. Low-and-behold, they had one lonesome Classic Mumm-Ra misplaced with some assorted action figures. I purchased it without hesitation.
I frequently overuse the word "glorious". In this case though, it would not be hyperbole. The figure is, hands down, a solid gold $14 toy. The precise lines of the sculpt and lush articulation are complemented by a needlessly rich paint job. Areas as small as the bridge of the nose and neck flap on Mumm-Ra's helmet have their own paint applications. Speaking of the helmet, the Caduceus-like snakes on the top have sculpted tongues and painted eyes. For accessories, the two sets of bandages seemed awkward at first and the instructions were not particularly useful in explaining if there was a "right" way to attach them. Upon further inspection, there is no wrong way to use them. No matter how you get them plugged into the figure's back they will make it appear as if Mumm-Ra is exploding out of them. It's a neat effect.
Are there downers? Hmmm... The skirt hinders the hip movement and the insole tassels (which should be yellow) hobble the forward movement on the ankle joint a little. There is no cape. And the alternate dildo-gripping hands are useless without some kind of accessory in them.
Curiously, Mumm-Ra works it commando. Sadly, there are no sculpted mummified genitals.
I would easily pony up an extra $5 for a deluxe version with a cape, some airbrushed shading on the body, and a few accessories. Because that would put it in the same ballpark as a Masters of the Universe Classics figure and, frankly, this toy already has those beat by a mile. It's amazing.
Doofy face or not, I'll buy a 6" Lion-O if I ever see one in stores.
Regarding the last point, I finally - FINALLY - saw an 8" Lion-O in a store this past weekend. Naturally, it was totally out of place in the wrong part of the toy isles. As if it were somehow running from the dozens of Tigra figures malingering on the shelf. But today I was on the other side of the city and popped into a Big Box. Low-and-behold, they had one lonesome Classic Mumm-Ra misplaced with some assorted action figures. I purchased it without hesitation.
I frequently overuse the word "glorious". In this case though, it would not be hyperbole. The figure is, hands down, a solid gold $14 toy. The precise lines of the sculpt and lush articulation are complemented by a needlessly rich paint job. Areas as small as the bridge of the nose and neck flap on Mumm-Ra's helmet have their own paint applications. Speaking of the helmet, the Caduceus-like snakes on the top have sculpted tongues and painted eyes. For accessories, the two sets of bandages seemed awkward at first and the instructions were not particularly useful in explaining if there was a "right" way to attach them. Upon further inspection, there is no wrong way to use them. No matter how you get them plugged into the figure's back they will make it appear as if Mumm-Ra is exploding out of them. It's a neat effect.
Are there downers? Hmmm... The skirt hinders the hip movement and the insole tassels (which should be yellow) hobble the forward movement on the ankle joint a little. There is no cape. And the alternate dildo-gripping hands are useless without some kind of accessory in them.
Curiously, Mumm-Ra works it commando. Sadly, there are no sculpted mummified genitals.
I would easily pony up an extra $5 for a deluxe version with a cape, some airbrushed shading on the body, and a few accessories. Because that would put it in the same ballpark as a Masters of the Universe Classics figure and, frankly, this toy already has those beat by a mile. It's amazing.
Doofy face or not, I'll buy a 6" Lion-O if I ever see one in stores.
| January 03, 2012 09:25PM |
| January 04, 2012 09:00AM |
If anyone wants comparison pics of 6" Mumm-Ra, some obscure toy guy did a review with a nice spread.
He talks about Mumm-Ra being the same size as He-Man, but I don't see it since Mumm-Ra's head is smaller. And, really, He-Man is an odd duck for size at around 7" or so (though Mattel insists MOTUC is a 6" scale line and that He-Man is just heroically large in the loincloth).
He talks about Mumm-Ra being the same size as He-Man, but I don't see it since Mumm-Ra's head is smaller. And, really, He-Man is an odd duck for size at around 7" or so (though Mattel insists MOTUC is a 6" scale line and that He-Man is just heroically large in the loincloth).
| January 04, 2012 01:19PM |
The completist in me forced a buy of the new Lion-O, but both Mumm-Ras I saw in the store had QC issues--badly painted chest emblem on one and sculpt snafus on the other. Will have to keep searching.
I kind of liked the oversized quality of the 8" figs, as they reminded me of the oversized vintage figs. That said, the Mumm-Ra definitely looks good.
I kind of liked the oversized quality of the 8" figs, as they reminded me of the oversized vintage figs. That said, the Mumm-Ra definitely looks good.
| January 05, 2012 07:18AM |
So I snagged the Mum-Ra and on a whim picked up the Lion-O. Yeah the head bugs me...but I'd be lying if I said that he isn't a fun toy. Not really sure why, but he seems to be easier to balance in extreme poses that the larger one...hmmm....
Mum-Ra is, in fact, the bomb. Now let's see if we get any more...My guess is no...
My only niggle is Lion-O's stupid rubber sword...But to be honest I don't remember any of the vintage figures having straight weapons either...
Oh and just so that we are all clear I was planning on skipping these guys until Gcrush talked me into it...
Mum-Ra is, in fact, the bomb. Now let's see if we get any more...My guess is no...
My only niggle is Lion-O's stupid rubber sword...But to be honest I don't remember any of the vintage figures having straight weapons either...
Oh and just so that we are all clear I was planning on skipping these guys until Gcrush talked me into it...
| January 05, 2012 09:43AM |
fel9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So I snagged the Mum-Ra and on a whim picked up
> the Lion-O. Yeah the head bugs me...but I'd be
> lying if I said that he isn't a fun toy.
Yeah, the screamy face wouldn't be my first choice, but it provides some nice symmetry to Mumm-Ra.
> Mum-Ra is, in fact, the bomb. Now let's see if we
> get any more...My guess is no...
I wouldn't mind seeing refreshes of Lion-O and Mumm-Ra with calmer expressions later on. Perhaps such a Mumm-Ra could include the vintage swords instead of the 'sploding bandages.
> My only niggle is Lion-O's stupid rubber
> sword...But to be honest I don't remember any of
> the vintage figures having straight weapons
> either...
Do these warp under their own weight, too? That's what kept me from picking up the 8" Lion-O...
> Oh and just so that we are all clear I was
> planning on skipping these guys until Gcrush
> talked me into it...
I'm just the ambassador. It's really Mumm-Ra you should be thanking.
-------------------------------------------------------
> So I snagged the Mum-Ra and on a whim picked up
> the Lion-O. Yeah the head bugs me...but I'd be
> lying if I said that he isn't a fun toy.
Yeah, the screamy face wouldn't be my first choice, but it provides some nice symmetry to Mumm-Ra.
> Mum-Ra is, in fact, the bomb. Now let's see if we
> get any more...My guess is no...
I wouldn't mind seeing refreshes of Lion-O and Mumm-Ra with calmer expressions later on. Perhaps such a Mumm-Ra could include the vintage swords instead of the 'sploding bandages.
> My only niggle is Lion-O's stupid rubber
> sword...But to be honest I don't remember any of
> the vintage figures having straight weapons
> either...
Do these warp under their own weight, too? That's what kept me from picking up the 8" Lion-O...
> Oh and just so that we are all clear I was
> planning on skipping these guys until Gcrush
> talked me into it...
I'm just the ambassador. It's really Mumm-Ra you should be thanking.
| January 05, 2012 10:10AM |
Gcrush:
1.) Re-releases with new heads would be fine, but let's see some other characters first. Different accessories are always fun, but I will admit that the bendy rubber stuff they are using for them actually works great for Mum-Ra's bandages.
2.)Yeah the weapons on the 8" figs do indeed warp under their own weight. Not a problem for Tygra's whip, but not so hot for the Sword of Omens.
3.)Mum-Ra is indeed a great figure...It has been a long time that I have been this happy with a toy purchase from the Wal-Mart...
1.) Re-releases with new heads would be fine, but let's see some other characters first. Different accessories are always fun, but I will admit that the bendy rubber stuff they are using for them actually works great for Mum-Ra's bandages.
2.)Yeah the weapons on the 8" figs do indeed warp under their own weight. Not a problem for Tygra's whip, but not so hot for the Sword of Omens.
3.)Mum-Ra is indeed a great figure...It has been a long time that I have been this happy with a toy purchase from the Wal-Mart...
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
January 05, 2012 10:34AM |
| January 05, 2012 10:49AM |
| January 05, 2012 03:49PM |
Sanjeev Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Y'all should get B00 to CAD up a Sword of Omens at
> different scales...then you could print and paint
> 'em for cheap...and they'd be tough as nails.
>
> Seriously. Make it happen.
[www.shapeways.com]
Some enterprising soul got the memo early. Damn, (s)he's charging a lot.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Y'all should get B00 to CAD up a Sword of Omens at
> different scales...then you could print and paint
> 'em for cheap...and they'd be tough as nails.
>
> Seriously. Make it happen.
[www.shapeways.com]
Some enterprising soul got the memo early. Damn, (s)he's charging a lot.
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
January 05, 2012 04:55PM |
Huh...It was my understanding that you *cannot* control the prices on Shapeways. You just model something, create a storefront, sell the shit for whatever the volume/material-based cost is...and they give you a cut.
Anyway, that sword is more than a foot long! The price makes sense...I just don't know what it's for. Is there a jumbo-sized Lion-O figure???
Well, someone should just contact that seller, ask her to scale down the model to action figure-scale, then offer that for sale...
Anyway, that sword is more than a foot long! The price makes sense...I just don't know what it's for. Is there a jumbo-sized Lion-O figure???
Well, someone should just contact that seller, ask her to scale down the model to action figure-scale, then offer that for sale...
| January 05, 2012 05:33PM |
Sanjeev Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Huh...It was my understanding that you *cannot*
> control the prices on Shapeways. You just model
> something, create a storefront, sell the shit for
> whatever the volume/material-based cost is...and
> they give you a cut.
>
I recently bought a few things from a dude who'd waived his cut for me, so I assumed that he had control over pricing, too. But I guess the amount of the cut isn't up to the designer (?).
> Anyway, that sword is more than a foot long! The
> price makes sense...I just don't know what it's
> for. Is there a jumbo-sized Lion-O figure???
>
Yeah, I misread the dimensions. No jumbo Lion-O except for that 14" Mezco figure, but that one came with its own sword.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Huh...It was my understanding that you *cannot*
> control the prices on Shapeways. You just model
> something, create a storefront, sell the shit for
> whatever the volume/material-based cost is...and
> they give you a cut.
>
I recently bought a few things from a dude who'd waived his cut for me, so I assumed that he had control over pricing, too. But I guess the amount of the cut isn't up to the designer (?).
> Anyway, that sword is more than a foot long! The
> price makes sense...I just don't know what it's
> for. Is there a jumbo-sized Lion-O figure???
>
Yeah, I misread the dimensions. No jumbo Lion-O except for that 14" Mezco figure, but that one came with its own sword.
| January 11, 2012 10:33PM |
Gcrush Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doofy face or not, I'll buy a 6" Lion-O if I ever
> see one in stores.
That day arrived. Wow again. For $14, these crisply molded toys cannot be beat. Not by a long shot. I am awed by how much fun this stupid thing is. The candied gloss finish has been tastefully remmoved. The screaming face is no problem and looks good when posed next to Mumm-Ra. The claw shield and sword variations (and hands) are generous beyond expectation. And the painfully detailed instruction sheet is the cherry on top of an excellent job of budget packaging. It's all too much. While my Thunder-Soul is now complete and can die happily because I have the perfect Lion-O and Mumm-Ra figures on my shelf, I'd by lying if I said I wouldn't buy every classic character they make if they all hit spots as sweet as these two.
I'm stretching for complaints... The paint on the face is only 90% perfect. The hips don't allow the knees to come all the way up to the chest. The ankle pins are yeller instead of blue. And the big sword is limp (though the flexability on the little one is beneficial for stowage). None of these dimish the thrill of this toy. Not in the least.
BOO, if you're reading this - make us the perfect Sword of Omens. Please!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Doofy face or not, I'll buy a 6" Lion-O if I ever
> see one in stores.
That day arrived. Wow again. For $14, these crisply molded toys cannot be beat. Not by a long shot. I am awed by how much fun this stupid thing is. The candied gloss finish has been tastefully remmoved. The screaming face is no problem and looks good when posed next to Mumm-Ra. The claw shield and sword variations (and hands) are generous beyond expectation. And the painfully detailed instruction sheet is the cherry on top of an excellent job of budget packaging. It's all too much. While my Thunder-Soul is now complete and can die happily because I have the perfect Lion-O and Mumm-Ra figures on my shelf, I'd by lying if I said I wouldn't buy every classic character they make if they all hit spots as sweet as these two.
I'm stretching for complaints... The paint on the face is only 90% perfect. The hips don't allow the knees to come all the way up to the chest. The ankle pins are yeller instead of blue. And the big sword is limp (though the flexability on the little one is beneficial for stowage). None of these dimish the thrill of this toy. Not in the least.
BOO, if you're reading this - make us the perfect Sword of Omens. Please!
| January 12, 2012 02:22AM |
| January 12, 2012 06:03AM |
| February 05, 2012 06:08PM |
If the Thunderfluffies had used some good old-fashioned BJJ, then they would have had no problems choking or tapping out Mumm-Ra and the Evil Mutants within the first couple of episodes. CARTOON MAKES NO SENSE!
Triangle:
Arm Triangle:
Guillotine:
Heel Hook
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2012 06:12PM by gingaio.
Triangle:
Arm Triangle:
Guillotine:
Heel Hook
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2012 06:12PM by gingaio.
| February 05, 2012 06:15PM |
Arm bar:
Rear naked choke:
And yeah, the screaming face on the 6" fig really, really sucks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2012 06:17PM by gingaio.
Rear naked choke:
And yeah, the screaming face on the 6" fig really, really sucks.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/05/2012 06:17PM by gingaio.
| February 12, 2012 02:42PM |
Took a spin into TRU yesterday, and saw this cool golden Armour of Omens! At first I thought no biggies, just another character, but THEN, I see Bandai took a page straight from Gordian! It's actually a toy of a giant 16ft armor/mechsuit thingy, with a little Lion0 fig to go inside. I haven't kept up with the cartoon, so didn't even realize this existed.
Cool design, and a heavy toy. Not much articulation sadly, but sure looks pretty, with the Brave-style gold chrome chest piece and all.
[www.toysrus.com]
Cool design, and a heavy toy. Not much articulation sadly, but sure looks pretty, with the Brave-style gold chrome chest piece and all.
[www.toysrus.com]
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
February 12, 2012 03:58PM |
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
February 14, 2012 10:45PM |
JoshB comes through as usual with the comprehensive Bandai coverage at Toyfair!
[www.collectiondx.com]
[www.collectiondx.com]
| February 14, 2012 11:03PM |
| February 24, 2012 04:29PM |
[www.thundercats.ws]
Good grief, I want to buy this, but I know I'll just regret it and eBay it.
I'll be accepting your arguments against, please. Convince me not to buy this silly thing.
Good grief, I want to buy this, but I know I'll just regret it and eBay it.
I'll be accepting your arguments against, please. Convince me not to buy this silly thing.
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
February 24, 2012 04:40PM |
It, uh, kinda doesn't do much. Or rather...anything. I mean, it looks cool, certainly, but do you need a 6lb lump of poly-something-or-other that doesn't really interact in any way with anything else you have? If it had a little scale Thundertank or tiny static miniatures of the characters, it might be kinda groovy. But as it is, it's just a glorified book end. Meh.
I'm not a fan of statues, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I'm a HUGE Grendizer fan...and while this similar product actually featured a miniature AND a spring-loaded gimmick, it still ended up pretty lackluster.
I'm not a fan of statues, so take my opinion with a grain of salt, but I'm a HUGE Grendizer fan...and while this similar product actually featured a miniature AND a spring-loaded gimmick, it still ended up pretty lackluster.
| February 24, 2012 04:53PM |
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
February 24, 2012 09:35PM |
| February 24, 2012 11:11PM |
When asked to recommend a fine vintage, I always say 1986 t'was a good year.(with properly arched eyebrow)
Cat's Lair. I remember digging this design as a kid, but at 13, putting big money into a playset wasn't happening, when there were BMX BIKES!! & ATC's!!, to blow your money on.
[www.thundercatslair.org]
MummRa's Tomb. I don't even remember this thing in stores. Maybe it was just so overshadowed by the lazerrrbeam-y Cat's Lair?
[www.thundercatslair.org]
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/24/2012 11:16PM by repairtechjon.
Cat's Lair. I remember digging this design as a kid, but at 13, putting big money into a playset wasn't happening, when there were BMX BIKES!! & ATC's!!, to blow your money on.
[www.thundercatslair.org]
MummRa's Tomb. I don't even remember this thing in stores. Maybe it was just so overshadowed by the lazerrrbeam-y Cat's Lair?
[www.thundercatslair.org]
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/24/2012 11:16PM by repairtechjon.
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
February 25, 2012 09:37PM |
| February 27, 2012 07:11PM |
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
March 29, 2012 10:18AM |
Well, this is hardly an official confirmation...but I think it's pretty clear that the new Thundercats is dead...
[www.toplessrobot.com]
[www.toplessrobot.com]
| March 29, 2012 11:03AM |
| March 29, 2012 07:58PM |
Sanjeev Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, this is hardly an official
> confirmation...but I think it's pretty clear that
> the new Thundercats is dead...
>
> [www.toplessrobot.com]
> _thundercats_have_been_sent_back_to.php
It is sad, but not surprising.
I mean, even when it was running on Friday there wasn't that much publicity after the launch. If not for comments here I wouldn't have even known when new episodes started. And the Saturday time slot? I didn't even know it was moved to Sat.
Of course I expect such impossible things as promotion and ads running during Cartoon Network that actually list times, and that's my mistake.
It's really too bad. I like the show. It was 'destination programming' for me.
Bah.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, this is hardly an official
> confirmation...but I think it's pretty clear that
> the new Thundercats is dead...
>
> [www.toplessrobot.com]
> _thundercats_have_been_sent_back_to.php
It is sad, but not surprising.
I mean, even when it was running on Friday there wasn't that much publicity after the launch. If not for comments here I wouldn't have even known when new episodes started. And the Saturday time slot? I didn't even know it was moved to Sat.
Of course I expect such impossible things as promotion and ads running during Cartoon Network that actually list times, and that's my mistake.
It's really too bad. I like the show. It was 'destination programming' for me.
Bah.
| March 29, 2012 11:24PM |
Back when the Simpson's first came out, the nerd herd would gather beers around the warm humm of the VCR to re-watch episodes the night they aired, mercilessly rewinding over and over through the funnier gags (Pitt the Elder vs. Lord Palmerstone almost killed the poor thing).
In my limited "free time" (actually, while dosing the girl with formula) I found myself watching the new episode from the weekend for the third time today, same as I did the "finale" with Grune. It's ridiculous how good this show is, and if that's not enough to save its bacon, why bother making shows this good in the first place if not just to FRUSTRATE ME!?!?!
In my limited "free time" (actually, while dosing the girl with formula) I found myself watching the new episode from the weekend for the third time today, same as I did the "finale" with Grune. It's ridiculous how good this show is, and if that's not enough to save its bacon, why bother making shows this good in the first place if not just to FRUSTRATE ME!?!?!
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
March 30, 2012 08:36AM |
| March 31, 2012 04:50AM |
Granted it may seem grim but wasn't the show already confirmed for 52 episodes? I'm willing to bet it's not coming back for a minute in order to shore up the production schedule and avoid another mid-season break.
If I'm not mistaken, Avatar got this same kinda treatment from season to season.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/31/2012 05:10AM by Kwesi K..
If I'm not mistaken, Avatar got this same kinda treatment from season to season.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/31/2012 05:10AM by Kwesi K..
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
March 31, 2012 11:41AM |
| March 31, 2012 12:32PM |
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
March 31, 2012 02:25PM |
| March 31, 2012 04:27PM |
The only reason why I come to these conclusions is that both shows were produced using pretty good quality Korean and Japanese studios. It takes a good amount of time to get everyone's ducks lined up in a row for original shows made this way. Not to mention the possible production delays because of re-shoots due to errors, other projects that Studio 4C may be up to or maybe even the need for Bandai to get it's toy strategy shored up.
In other words, somewhat educated wishful thinking...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/31/2012 04:28PM by Kwesi K..
In other words, somewhat educated wishful thinking...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/31/2012 04:28PM by Kwesi K..
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.


