Home
> Original Invincible BBS
> Topic
Wave Patlabor action figures!
Posted by thomas
| October 18, 2007 03:08PM |
| October 18, 2007 05:57PM |
| October 18, 2007 08:49PM |
The scale of CM's Ingram is hard to determine exactly because there are quite a number of ways to position the head, causing the antenna to tip up or down at different heights. By taking an average measurements of the 'same scale' sofubi figures, it works out to about 1/46to me.
The best way to confirm is to physically compare the CM's to the WHAM when it comes out.
Alternatively, if anyone has a built a 1/35 MG Ingram, he may do us Patlabor fans a favor by measuring the height(s) to see how Bandai determined their 'official scale'.
Edited to correct approx scale of 1/43 to 1/46 after checking my toy DB.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/19/2007 02:59AM by drifand.
The best way to confirm is to physically compare the CM's to the WHAM when it comes out.
Alternatively, if anyone has a built a 1/35 MG Ingram, he may do us Patlabor fans a favor by measuring the height(s) to see how Bandai determined their 'official scale'.
Edited to correct approx scale of 1/43 to 1/46 after checking my toy DB.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/19/2007 02:59AM by drifand.
|
Anonymous User
|
October 19, 2007 12:24AM |
This is seriously f*cked up. I just bought the CMs Ingram (and Griffon) and now Wave is releasing an entirely new line? Worse still - it looks like it will have better proportions and the feet/ankle joints will most likely be more poseable! *sigh*
My bitching aside, I'm really anxious to see how these turn out. If Ingram turns out well, I might buy it. Who knows, maybe even Helldiver too.
My bitching aside, I'm really anxious to see how these turn out. If Ingram turns out well, I might buy it. Who knows, maybe even Helldiver too.
| October 19, 2007 03:07AM |
Well, so far my personal experience with WHAM figures is only the 1/12 Tachi Yellow. It's all-plastic and the paintjob is OK (not great), but I do appreciate the tampo printing. Poseability is also OK, not great because the joints are too loose (needs Revoltech treatment!). The only other insight to WHAM would be the love-it-or-hate-it 1/5000 SDF-1. Superior finishing but IMO lacks 'oomph'. A common thread so far: little or no gimmicks.
I think the least we should expect for a 9800yen Ingram is the extending arm and opening gun compartment...
I think the least we should expect for a 9800yen Ingram is the extending arm and opening gun compartment...
|
Sanjeev (Admin)
|
October 19, 2007 10:17AM |
|
Anonymous User
|
October 19, 2007 11:54AM |
| October 19, 2007 01:07PM |
drifand Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, so far my personal experience with WHAM
> figures is only the 1/12 Tachi Yellow. It's
> all-plastic and the paintjob is OK (not great),
> but I do appreciate the tampo printing.
> Poseability is also OK, not great because the
> joints are too loose (needs Revoltech treatment!).
> The only other insight to WHAM would be the
> love-it-or-hate-it 1/5000 SDF-1. Superior
> finishing but IMO lacks 'oomph'. A common thread
> so far: little or no gimmicks.
>
> I think the least we should expect for a 9800yen
> Ingram is the extending arm and opening gun
> compartment...
...my sentiments exactly!!!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, so far my personal experience with WHAM
> figures is only the 1/12 Tachi Yellow. It's
> all-plastic and the paintjob is OK (not great),
> but I do appreciate the tampo printing.
> Poseability is also OK, not great because the
> joints are too loose (needs Revoltech treatment!).
> The only other insight to WHAM would be the
> love-it-or-hate-it 1/5000 SDF-1. Superior
> finishing but IMO lacks 'oomph'. A common thread
> so far: little or no gimmicks.
>
> I think the least we should expect for a 9800yen
> Ingram is the extending arm and opening gun
> compartment...
...my sentiments exactly!!!
| October 19, 2007 10:35PM |
| July 07, 2008 10:46AM |
| July 07, 2008 09:57PM |
Bitching on Macrossworld? ...bitchin' man... I went back to HLJ and saw the original info from the convention pics. All they say is Summer 2008 which is now. I'm a little surprised that there isn't anything about them in the hobby mags or a preorder up anywhere. I really want to do some CM's/W.H.A.M. mixing and matching.
| July 08, 2008 11:10AM |
I'm with you, dude. The WHAM Ingram is a waste of time but I'd definitely spring for the Helldiver especially since 1/48 isn't that far off from the CM's estimated 1/46 or thereabouts. If WAVE are serious about making money, they should just move on from the AV-98 and splash out on everything else CM's didn't do, e.g. the Python, Hannibal etc. The non-diecast WHAM figures like their SAC Tachikomas are basically no-gimmick painted and assembled plastic kits. I'd take those over sofubi if they make 'em.
| August 13, 2008 04:35AM |
|
Anonymous User
|
August 13, 2008 06:49AM |
The Wave one looks like crap. It has too little details. I hate the rubber-coated joints - can't beat the cloth one. I hate the proportions. And it looks too plasticky. It's also not poseable enough - it can't even stand nicely with a decent A-stance. In short - it looks as shitty as the Bandai MG one. The MSIA one is way better than this. I'll most likely get it.
| August 13, 2008 07:12AM |
| August 13, 2008 03:49PM |
| August 14, 2008 07:06AM |
This pic says it all for me:
Look at how stiff and unnatural the pose is! The WAVE Ingram seems to be unable to raise its arm without moving the entire shoulder armor. That's the price of a restrictive rubber shroud.
Heck, looks like the head can't even tilt UP to look at targets.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/14/2008 07:07AM by drifand.
Look at how stiff and unnatural the pose is! The WAVE Ingram seems to be unable to raise its arm without moving the entire shoulder armor. That's the price of a restrictive rubber shroud.
Heck, looks like the head can't even tilt UP to look at targets.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/14/2008 07:07AM by drifand.
| May 12, 2009 12:13PM |
Here comes Heldiver...!
Better pics in the links.
[www.amiami.com]
[www.hobbystock.jp]
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/12/2009 12:14PM by Kwesi K..
Better pics in the links.
[www.amiami.com]
[www.hobbystock.jp]
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/12/2009 12:14PM by Kwesi K..
| May 12, 2009 03:36PM |
| May 12, 2009 04:44PM |
| May 12, 2009 06:39PM |
emerson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How was Wave's Ingram? Any less sloppy/floppy than
> the Patlabor toys CM's has been putting out
> recently?
If you're referring to the recent Brocken and Zero then the Waves are reportedly better, but there's only been one review and it was from Macrosworld, so it's tainted. But the Wave stuff is priced like the Brave Gokin CM's, and those are much nicer, especially when they're currently on sale for 1/2 price.
Frankly all of the Wave stuff in this line looks great but is just overpriced when you look at what the things actually offer. Wave has always catered to the higher end crowd, but they used to have the product to back it up, these are a little too crappy for the price and Wave name.
The Ingram went to clearance pretty fast, mainly due to the CM's just being a better product for the money. This might last a bit longer since there isn't an alternative in this scale outside of 20 year old resin kits, but the Revoltech is a very nice piece at 1/8 price - and there's plenty of other Revoltech Patlabor to complement it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How was Wave's Ingram? Any less sloppy/floppy than
> the Patlabor toys CM's has been putting out
> recently?
If you're referring to the recent Brocken and Zero then the Waves are reportedly better, but there's only been one review and it was from Macrosworld, so it's tainted. But the Wave stuff is priced like the Brave Gokin CM's, and those are much nicer, especially when they're currently on sale for 1/2 price.
Frankly all of the Wave stuff in this line looks great but is just overpriced when you look at what the things actually offer. Wave has always catered to the higher end crowd, but they used to have the product to back it up, these are a little too crappy for the price and Wave name.
The Ingram went to clearance pretty fast, mainly due to the CM's just being a better product for the money. This might last a bit longer since there isn't an alternative in this scale outside of 20 year old resin kits, but the Revoltech is a very nice piece at 1/8 price - and there's plenty of other Revoltech Patlabor to complement it.
| May 13, 2009 03:08AM |
| March 30, 2010 01:34PM |
[www.1999.co.jp]
Does anyone know if "sold out" in fact means sold out on this site, or is it just particularly bad Engrish for not available, i.e. not out yet?
Does anyone know if "sold out" in fact means sold out on this site, or is it just particularly bad Engrish for not available, i.e. not out yet?
| March 30, 2010 11:13PM |
| March 31, 2010 10:10AM |
| April 05, 2010 10:31AM |
both the helldiver and the ingram are pretty cool built up models. They are more in line with model kits rather than the CM corp toys. They look more "real" if one were to use such a term....
However, they are pretty expensive for something that will likely break if messed around with too much but to display- awesome.
However, they are pretty expensive for something that will likely break if messed around with too much but to display- awesome.
| April 05, 2010 02:38PM |
| April 09, 2010 05:39PM |
I'd recommend the Revoltech line of Patlabor stuff. All well done and they went far enough down the line to get to the Helldiver - which is arguably the best of the lot. You could also pick up the entire line for about the same cost as one of those.
The W.H.A.M. stuff never seemed to catch on, at least with the collectors here, I think I saw one review of the Ingram on MW - but it was ironically light on the specifics.
The W.H.A.M. stuff never seemed to catch on, at least with the collectors here, I think I saw one review of the Ingram on MW - but it was ironically light on the specifics.
| April 09, 2010 07:58PM |
Yeah, I have the Revy Griffon and Zero. Pretty neat little figs, but a little small. I am actually using their joints on my Yamato T-Rex right now. I really wanted a helldiver for doing battle with my Brave Gohkins but I would like to see a side by side of the two first, I think. I am not quite as crazy as I used to be, regarding what I am willing to spend, so I don't see myself buying this anytime soon. Thanks for the input.
WHAM's seem to be hit or miss. I love the Tachi's and the Uchi, and although a little overpriced, the Armsuits rawk, but the SDF-1 didn't seem to be worth it. It's more about price point for me in this case than overall value.
WHAM's seem to be hit or miss. I love the Tachi's and the Uchi, and although a little overpriced, the Armsuits rawk, but the SDF-1 didn't seem to be worth it. It's more about price point for me in this case than overall value.
| April 15, 2010 12:04PM |
I got the WHAM Armed Suit during the HLJ sale and liked it enough but paint stiction on the smaller arms caused a major problem: I broke the joints while posing them... it was helluva tough repair job :-/
The Tachis OTOH were surprisingly 'right' for what they were. All that diecast and opening hatches on the other brands' versions are cool, but tThe hollow construction of the WHAMs meant they were light enough to pull off some wacky poses, even sticking them upside down with some putty if you wanted to.
The Tachis OTOH were surprisingly 'right' for what they were. All that diecast and opening hatches on the other brands' versions are cool, but tThe hollow construction of the WHAMs meant they were light enough to pull off some wacky poses, even sticking them upside down with some putty if you wanted to.
| April 15, 2010 12:12PM |
| April 15, 2010 12:16PM |
| April 15, 2010 12:28PM |
| April 15, 2010 12:38PM |
| August 27, 2010 07:09AM |
I still haven't seen the WAVE Helldiver in person, nor any pictorials of it with the Ingram. Nor with the CM's line-up for comparison. But at least someone did a good write-up on it:
[www.toyboxcollection.com]
Pity about the so-so poseability.
[www.toyboxcollection.com]
Pity about the so-so poseability.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
